Latest comments

    In response to: Tyler Walker

    This is the correct Tyler Walker blog for anyone who wants to assay out out almost this subject. You observe so such its nearly wearying to represent with you (not that I real would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new reel on a topic thats been graphical virtually for life. Fastidious squeeze, simply high!
    PermalinkPermalink 07/26/12 @ 13:19

    In response to: The 1970 Indy "500" winner Al Unser !

    American Airways Junk Mail [Visitor] · http://www.scriptfrenzy.org/eng/user/1083112
    Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is excellent, let alone the content!
    PermalinkPermalink 07/26/12 @ 13:09

    In response to: The 1970 Indy "500" winner Al Unser !

    Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the way, how could we communicate?
    PermalinkPermalink 07/26/12 @ 12:22

    In response to: The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman !

    Wow, marvelous blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is great, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman ! .
    PermalinkPermalink 07/26/12 @ 08:34

    In response to: The 1928 Indy "500" winner Louis Meyer !

    Sydney Tutterow [Visitor] · http://bestoffershunter.constantcontactt.com
    Really great visual appeal on this site, I'd value it 10.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/25/12 @ 13:34

    In response to: Brian Leppo!

    Damien Simoens [Visitor] · http://google.com/
    hi!,I love your writing so so much! proportion we keep up a correspondence more about your post on AOL? I require a specialist in this area to solve my problem. May be that is you! Taking a look ahead to look you.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/25/12 @ 07:24

    In response to: Davey Sammons!

    Telma Yerkovich [Visitor] · http://foodmixers.co.cc
    Some truly choice articles on this internet site , saved to bookmarks .
    PermalinkPermalink 07/25/12 @ 05:52

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    If you're still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you'll know which is right for you.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/25/12 @ 05:47

    In response to: The 1970 Indy "500" winner Al Unser !

    Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is fantastic, as well as the content!
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 09:07

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan çanta [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass' favor.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:04

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan çanta [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    I'll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:03

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan babet [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It's very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:02

    In response to: The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman !

    This is the punish The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman ! journal for anyone who wants to attempt out out most this issue. You asking so overmuch its virtually exhausting to contend with you (not that I real would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new whirl on a theme thats been inscribed about for eld. Respectable bunk, just majuscule!
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:01

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan çanta [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    Between me and my husband we've owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I've settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:00

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan babet [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it'll do even better in those areas, but for now it's a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod's strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 08:00

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan babet [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good,but not as good as the iPod's. It works well, but isn't as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that's not an issue, but if you're planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod's larger screen and better browser may be important.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 07:59

    In response to: Alan Krimes 2012!

    Ryan Troup [Visitor] · http://sheetsed.co.cc
    Does your website have a contact page? I'm having a tough time locating it but, I'd like to shoot you an e-mail. I've got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it expand over time.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 07:54

    In response to: The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman !

    This is the penalise The 1952 Indy "500" winner Troy Ruttman ! diary for anyone who wants to assay out out around this message. You mark so overmuch its nearly debilitating to contend with you (not that I truly would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new protract on a content thats been typewritten near for life. Pleasant object, only high!
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 07:54

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan babet [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it'll do even better in those areas, but for now it's a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod's strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 07:46

    In response to: The 1961, 1964, 1967, and 1977 of the Indy "500" winner !

    bayan çanta [Visitor] · http://www.enguzelayakkabi.com
    Between me and my husband we've owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I've settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
    PermalinkPermalink 07/23/12 @ 05:25
    May 2013
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     << <   > >>
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  

    I'm a second generation photographer, my father, Dick Greenawalt was the official photographer for URC.I started shooting at age 9 ( 1975 ) at Convention Hall in Atlantic City NJ, then at Reading for USAC races. At one time I was the youngest photographer in the east, after meeting Cris Economaki at Atlantic City I began to shoot for National Speed Sport News. I have traveled all over PA, NY, NJ, following sprint cars. I have been one of the track photographers for Williams Grove Speedway in the 1980's, and at that time I also worked for Gater News as there representative at Williams Grove and other tracks : Ascot Speedway-CA, Knoxville-Knoxville Nationals, Oswego Speedway-Classic and regular shows, Dover Downs-Nascar, Syracuse-Usac an Dirt Week, just to name a few. After a 17 year absence due my full time job I am happy to be back on the race trail again! I'm back at Williams Grove, Oswego, Lincoln and many other tracks that I've visited in the past.

    Search

    XML Feeds

    powered by b2evolution free blog software